Ralph: click me



Webmaster:
Nefer Sekhmet, OM

Design by Helen

 


A monthly Magazine edited and published by Maria Lopes - April 2006

 
Dear Friends,

 The first book against bullfights written in the English language has just been published.
By Michael A. Ogorzaly, "When Bulls Cry : The Case Against Bullfighting" is a must read.
There are some books against bullfights by Spanish and French writers but this is the first one in English.
One of our members is part-way through this book and can thoroughly recommend it.
The book is available at
www.authorhouse.com at the cost of $14.95 + $5 shipping/handling for U.S.A.

For Europe you can buy it at www.authorhouse.co.uk , prices depend upon which country you are ordering it from.

For the Animals

Maria Lopes
Coordinator of the International Movement Against Bullfights

 


AUSTRIA
 
UPDATE : EU threat against Austrian circus animal ban thwarted!
 
Source:http://www.vgt.at/circus.php
 
Since middle of April there is a new situation in our campaign to stop the Commission threatening Austria to undo the ban on wild animals in circuses. Commissioner McCreevy said in regard to the infringement proceeding last week: "As we had received a complaint, we had to follow it up. But I am confident that this case can soon be closed."
Insiders in Brussels say that it looks very good for us now. It is moreover said, that in most cases the Commission doesn't close such infringement proceedings officially, they prefer to simply make no mentioning of the case anymore.
 
It would be good now to force the Commission to bring the infringement proceedings to an official end, because ...
 
1. this would raise legal certainty for all European countries and regions which have banned wild animals in circuses or which plan to do so and
2. the increasing importance of the wellbeing of animals in the EU would be improved by a official statement of the Commission.
 
So, may I ask you to write letters to Commissioner McCreevy. You could tell him that you heard rumors that the infringement proceedings regarding wild animals in circuses shall be closed. Tell him that the members of your organisation are well informed of the activities of the Commission and that they are very interested in informations about further developments. Ask him if he can officially confirm that the case against the ban on wild animals in circuses is closed.
 
Commissioner Charlie McCreevy
Member of the European Comission for Internal Market and Services
European Commission
B - 1049 Brussels
(Belgium)
Email:
Charlie.Mc-Creevy@cec.eu.int

 

Dear Commissioner,

 

I have heard reports that the contemplated action against the Austrian Govt for its alleged restrictions on the "Freedom of Provision of Services" within the EU regarding wild animals in circuses is to be closed.

I am aware through members of the organization to whom I belong of the activities of the Commission and am therefore very interested in information about further developments.

Could you please officially confirm that the case against the ban on wild animals in circuses is closed?

 

Awaiting your reply,

 

Yours sincerely

Nome/País

 
_________________________
 
Campaign history:
 
EU threat against Austrian circus animal ban thwarted!
 
After complaints by foreign circuses, the EU commission threatened to undo the Austrian ban on wild animals. A concerted 7 month EU-wide campaign persuaded the EU-commissioner otherwise.
 
From 1996, the Austrian animal rights group VGT had run a nationwide campaign in Austria to persuade the public and the politicians that wild animals in circuses must be banned. After a 2 year phase-out period, this complete ban on all wild animals actually came into place on 1st January 2005. In Austria, a last circus using zebras, buffaloes and a fox was stopped after a few months, while foreign circuses with wild animals were not allowed into the country. A German circus, who was denied entrance, complained to the EU- Commission. In a letter dated 12th October 2005, the EU-Commissioner for the Internal Market, Charlie McCreevy, threatened the Austrian government to withdraw the law, otherwise it will be challenged in the European Courts. According to his opinion, the ban on wild animals was going too far to achieve the aim of animal protection and hence unlawfully restricted the Freedom of Provision of Services within the EU.
 
The EU-Commission demanded that the law at least be changed such that foreign circuses with wild animals can freely enter Austria and do performances here. According to the Freedom of Provision of Services, one of the 4 basic Freedoms of the Internal Market, somebody, who legally provides services in one country, must be able to do so in
any other country in the EU. According to this view it would be sufficient to have one EU member state allowing wild animals in circuses, so that all circuses from this country could go around the whole of the EU to do wild animal circus shows.
 
Albeit the EU Commission being a formidable opponent, VGT decided to rise to the challenge. Professional expert evidence on EU law and on the suffering of wild animals in circuses was attained and presented to the EU-Commissioner and the Austrian government. On 20th December 2005, VGT presented a website (www.vgt.at/circus.php) dedicated to this campaign in 30 different languages. With an automated service, visitors of the site could read and send protest emails in their own language to their EU Commissioner and to Commissioner McCreevy. At the beginning of April, more than 20.000 people had already used that opportunity. In addition, a large number of individuals and groups right across the EU have sent their own letters of complaint and expert statements in defence of the Austrian ban. Internationally, animal welfare as much as animal rights is united behind demanding a ban on wild animals in circuses. Even the Eurogroup for Animal Welfare, an association of a large number of national animal welfare
groups in the EU, has issued a statement in favour of banning wild animals from circuses.
 
Also in the EU-Parliament, MEPs started to defend the Austrian ban. MEP Jörg Leichtfried from the Austrian Social Democrats gave speech in the EU-Parliament on 13th December 2005 in the presence of Commissioner McCreevy saying that the protection of the welfare of animals must be paramount in the EU. Hence with the ban on wild animals in circuses, Austria is leading the way for animal protection and should be applauded not reprimanded. Altogether there were 4 times official questions posed to the EU-Commission during December 2005 and January 2006 by MEPs, in support of the Austrian ban and against the steps taken by the Commission: 2 from Austria (23. 11. and 6. 12. 2005), 1 from England (12. 1. 2006) and 1 from Holland (5. 1. 2006). In addition, a German MEP asked the EU-Council on 9. 12. 2005 similar questions.
 
By Mid-January 2006, the Austrian government answered to the EU- Commission that the ban is just and legal and that Austria will stand by it and take up any challenge against it in the European Court. A vast amount of media attention in favour of this position together with lobbying of the Austrian Parliament has helped the government coming to this decision. In the letter it is argued that no less than a ban is necessary to protect wild animals from suffering and that this goal is more important than the principle of free provision of services.
 
On 25th January 2006, Green Party MPs brought a bill to a vote in the Austrian Parliament which demands of the government to support the ban by all means and to use its 6 month period from 1st January 2006 as president of the EU-council to pressure for a similar ban EU-wide.
A large majority voted in favour of this proposition.
 
On 7th February 2006, the German Parliament followed suit. The Green Party put a similar proposal to the vote. Again, the large majority of Parliament approved the proposal, ending with the words: "The German Parliament is, together will all animal protectionists in the EU, expecting that the EU-Commission will stick to the aims formulated in the EU constitutional proposal, which included animal welfare, and hence that the Commission will support all efforts on the national level to protect wild animals and that it won't insist on forms of keeping and using animals that are inconsistent with animal welfare or the protection of species."
 
On 16th February 2006, EU Parliament decided on a new directive regarding the provision of services across borders within the EU.
After many protests, the fraction won the day which said that those providing services must abide by the laws of the country they are providing the services in. This decision, clearly, also supported the position that a ban on wild animals in one country must be respected
by the circuses in all other countries.
 
While the EU-Commissioner McCreevy was reluctant to answer any questions or to meet with animal advocate delegations, his replies to queries changed from being very assertive at the beginning of the campaign, to being quite defensive at the end. Also, a number of MEPs had been prompted by animal rights groups, especially the VGT, to have appointments with him and pressure for a reaction. It became more and more clear that animal rights had won the day. On 12th April 2006, Commissioner McCreevy said publicly regarding this case: "As we had received a complaint, we had to follow it up. But I am confident that this case can soon be closed." After publication of this statement, many MEPs congratulated the Commissioner to this decision to drop the case. With this outcome, it is clear that the wellbeing of animals is becoming an increasingly important issue in the EU.
 
So, while the case has not been closed officially, it seems that the Austrian ban on wild animals in circuses will prevail. Such cases, insiders in Brussels say, are never closed officially, but are just being ignored instead of decided, if they are not approved by the Commission. We must remain vigilant, but for now it is time to celebrate big time!
EUROPEAN UNION
 
China and its Accomplices
 
Source: ITD http://itstheirdestiny.2kat.net
 
Much has been reported on the unbelievably uncaring cruelty toward animals in China, particularly the treatment of cats, dogs and other animals used for their fur. There are literally no animal welfare laws to protect them. China is without doubt the world's largest producer of fur due to its cheap labour and lack of animal legislation. Film footage has been taken of animals being stunned by having their heads slammed against the ground and then skinned whilst still alive, often regaining consciousness and struggling during the process. Their killers would then hit them again, or simply hold their heads on the ground with their boots while they finished the job. Their still living bodies were then thrown onto a pile of their fellows, where they clearly continued to live and suffer for up to another 10 minutes. A silver fox is clearly seen to lift its head and blink an eye after having been skinned. Links to some of these videos are at the foot of this page.
 
In response to this outrageous abuse the USA, Australia, Switzerland, and 6 member nations of the EU (Italy, Denmark, France, Belgium, Greece, and Estonia) have banned the importation of dog and cat fur. In December 2003 the Scottish MEP Struan Stevenson suceeded in getting a resolution calling for an EU-wide ban on dog and cat fur approved by a large majority of the EU Parliament. The EU Commissioners however maintain that they don't have the authority to issue this ban as an EU directive. The Commissioners claim that such legislation can only be passed at a national level.
 
Despite an original commitment to a unilateral ban by the British government in December 2001, Blair's government has backed down on this issue, stating that:
   a) there is no evidence of these imports into the UK and
   b) such legislation must come from the EU.
 
We find it amazing that no-one seems able to pass this much needed legislation! Can it be that Europe is so afraid of losing cheap Chinese imports? This is nothing less than "buck passing" all round! While this ludicrous "catch-22" is allowed to continue, consumers are being duped into buying cat and dog fur intentionally unlabelled or mislabelled as faux fur, or as non-existant animals such as "gaewolf".
 
We call upon BOTH the EU Commission and individual European governments to legislate on this issue. As a UK based organisation, we are giving contact details for the British government and EU Commission, but would ask all citizens of ALL countries WORLDWIDE to ask their representatives to ban these vile imports.
 

What YOU can do
 
Leave a message for Prime Minister Tony Blair on his web site at http://www.number10.gov.uk/output/page821.asp

or write to him at 10 Downing Street, London SW1 2AA, UK.

 
Email the UK Minister for Trade and Industry Ian Pearson at

pearsoni@parliament.uk

 
UK CITIZENS ONLY write to your MP.

You can fax him or her for free at http://www.writetothem.com

 
Make it clear that you expect nothing short of a complete ban on the importation of these furs. The UK government is considering a voluntary labelling scheme. This would not work since Chinese furriers are on record as stating that they will put any labels on the furs to sell them!
 
 
Sample emails are below, but PLEASE write an original if you can and in your own language. Form letters are often simply discarded by politicians.
 
Sample email for Tony Blair and Ian Pearson only - NOT to be used for faxing your MP
 
Dear Sir,
 
In December 2001 the British government gave a commitment to ban the importation of dog and cat fur from China due to the unimaginable cruelty inflicted on these animals. This cruelty has been well documented and its validity has not been questioned by the government. To date however, this commitment has not been acted upon. The government instead claims that there is no evidence that these imports are coming into Britain, and that any such measures should be implemented by the EU. The EU Commission however states that it is up to each member state to pass such legislation. Whilst this indecision continues, countless dogs and cats are being skinned alive in China to supply furs for the UK market. The government has stated that there is no evidence of this trade within the UK, yet countless examples exist. Mr Struan Stevenson MEP was able to find several items of cat and dog fur for sale in Britain without difficulty.
 
It is intolerable that this situation be allowed to continue. In addition to the USA, Australia and Switzerland, six EU nations have already banned these imports. It seems unbelievable that the United Kingdom, birthplace of the RSPCA and animal welfare legislation, should be so reticent. Britain should have taken the lead on this issue, and not hidden in the shadows waiting for others to have the courage to make the decision on its behalf.
 
I urge you to do all in your power to bring about an early end to these sickening and offensive imports.
 
Yours sincerely,
 
Name
Address/Country
_____________________________

Sample email for EU Commissioners
 
Dear Commissioner,
 
As you are aware in December 2003 the Members of the European Parliament passed Written Declaration 17 calling for the banning of the importation and trade in dog and cat fur throughout the EU. To date no directive has been issued and this sickening trade continues throughout Europe. Few Europeans would knowingly support this incredibly cruel trade, and I urge you to issue a directive banning these items without delay. If the EU is to succeed it must be seen as democratic. Failure to enforce the decisions of its Parliament can only lead to its downfall.
 
Yours sincerely,
 
Name/Country
 

Links to videos. Please note - these are extremely unpleasant!
 
 
 

TURKEY
 
Horses bled to death in Turkey
 
Source:Barb (VeganWay)
 
 
Please send letters to:
 
Mustafa Ertek, M.D., President
Refik Saydam Hygiene Center
Cemal Gursel Caddesi, No. 18
06100 Sihhiye, Ankara
Turkey
mustafa.ertek@saglik.gov.tr
 

His Excellency Ahmet Necdet Sezer
President of the Turkish Republic
Cankaya Kosku
Sehit Ersan Caddesi, No. 14
Çankaya, Ankara
Turkey
cumhurbaskanligi@tccb.gov.tr
 

His Excellency Ahmet Necdet Sezer
Prime Minister of the Turkish Republic
Baþbakanlýk
Necatibey Cad., No. 108
Ankara
Turkey
bimer@basbakanlik.gov.tr
 
 
Stop the torture of horses
 
Dear Dr. Mustafa Ertek, President Ahmet Necdet Sezer, and Prime Minister Ahmet Necdet Sezer,
 
I was shocked and horrified after learning of the treatment of horses in Turkey by the government-run Refik Saydam Hygiene Center (RSHC). I urge you to stop these cruel procedures immediately and ensure that the Ministry of Health adheres to Turkey's Animal Protection Law.
 
Undercover video footage shows horses violently dragged to the ground with ropes so that their necks can be slashed with a scalpel while they are completely conscious. Their blood is then collected and used in medical products. The video captures shocking images of struggling horses whose blood is used in serum production. Workers bind the horses' legs closely to their bodies for restraint and sit on top of the struggling animals to hold them down. Moans of agony and shudders of pain reveal the horses to be fully conscious during the procedure, which sometimes lasts for hours.
The horses are then left to bleed to death. Finally, their bodies are
dragged outside and dumped beside the street.
 
In the United States and Europe, blood is collected from horses just as it's collected from human beings: A needle is inserted through the skin and into a vein. Horses stand comfortably in a stall during the procedure, and several liters of blood are collected without harming or killing the horses. It is nothing compared to the anguish experienced by the horses at the RSHC. The video reveals RSHC technicians who cannot or will not make a proper needle insertion and who instead crudely slash the horses' necks in order to expose the jugular vein. There is no excuse for this coarse and cruel technique.
 
The RSHC produces horse serum for the government as a cheap but dangerous substitute for human serum in medical products. The United States long ago used horse serum for rabies shots and other antitoxins until it was discovered that horse antibodies lead to a dangerous condition called "serum sickness" in 16 percent of patients. Today, horse blood is increasingly unnecessary for
medical use in the U.S., but when it is needed, obtaining it is nothing like what happens in this house of horrors run by the Turkish government.
 
Again, I urge you to stop the torture of horses immediately. This horrific cruelty will not be tolerated by civilized society.
 
Sincerely,
Name/Country

PETITIONS


STOP TORO DE LA VEGA EN TORDESILLAS
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/487300083?ltl=1146077015

 

Urge Korean Prime Minister to Strengthen Animal Protection Law
http://ga0.org/campaign/koreandogs_06/b386si2h5kwtjw?

 

Save endangered turtles, Bali, Indonesia
http://www.antinea-foundation.org/pages/petition_de.asp

 

Help STOP "Cruelty 101"
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/440822961?ltl=1146076877

 

Protest against mass extermination of 7800 neutered stray dogs in Varna/ Bulgaria
http://www.animal-life.ch/protest/hundetod_in%20_varna_e.html

 


Interview (english version) with dr. Janez Drnovek,president of Slovenia

 

Dr Janez Drnovsek about vegetarianism and animal rights

 

Vegetarianism would increase the chance for long-term survival of mankind
In the entire history of mankind there have only been a handful of notable statesmen who were vegetarians and seriously took a stand for animal rights. Even today there are very few. Slovenija is one of the few bright lights in the world of politics today. By giving this interview the president Dr Janez Drnovsek has for the first time expressed the message to people, to start thinking about unimaginable brutality that man is inflicting upon animals.

 

Why did you become a vegetarian and what changes did you notice as a result?

 

Because I feel vegetarian food is better, better quality. We eat meat because it’s the way we had been brought up. I have been a vegetarian for a few years and just recently I have become a vegan, which means I don’t eat milk, dairy products or eggs. There is still plenty of choice, varied vegetable foods, which are sufficient to our needs. I took this step following my inner feeling. Some people believe that vegan food is very limited and boring which is not true. It can be very diverse.

 

Was the main reason for changing your diet your serious illness a few years back?

 

That was the time I gradually started to change. First step was omitting red meat, then poultry and eventually fish.

 

After changing to vegetarian food do you feel better, healthier?

 

I feel great – they say I have too much energy.

 

On World protection of Animals Day (October 4th) you invited members of Society for Liberation of Animals and their rights for discussions. What was discussed?

 

I invited them mainly to try and convey the message to general public to coincide with this day. We don’t always realise how we treat animals, how we manage them. They are live creatures. As I said people have this set idea of behaviour towards animals and as result very rarely question what we actually cause. If we think for a moment how man manages animals and what impact he has on animal world we could say he was not human at all. Just think of all slaughter houses and production of beef or poultry where conditions for animals are impossible. Animals are transported in lorries many times without any water which is extremly cruel. It is not that people are bad they just don’t think about it. When the final product is in front of them on the plate they don’t think what was it before and how it got to this stage.

 

So you decided to become a vegetarian on ethical grounds as well?

 

The ethics are part of the reason; the other part is the fact that humans don’t need the animal flesh. It is only thinking patterns we follow that are ingrained in us. It is probably really hard to change overnight, but it can be done gradually. This is how I did it.

 

You spoke against subsidising mass livestock farming in the media. What was your reason for this?

 

I believe it is foolish, that European Union’s main priority is one hundred percent subsidy of farming especially meat products. The fact that EU subsidises mass production of meat and poultry is really the main obstacle from the ethics point of view. Not only that but also from the point of view of nutrition. We are frequently reminded by nature i.e. mad cow disease, recently swine fever, bird flu. It is obvious that something is not as it should be, something is disturbing the natures balance and that should be a warning to us all.

 

Vegetarian products in shops are more expensive than meat products, which does not encourage people to buy healthier food. Do you think that more people would stop eating meat if vegetarian option was cheaper?

 

That is a factor as well although I believe the main reason to be awareness of people. It is a question of making people aware of what is happening and what are they being part of. I think that is the key. That in turn leads to changes in politics i.e. agricultural policy, farming subsidies and future directions. Instead of using huge resources for mass meat production we should use it for organic farming of diverse produce from cereals, pulses, fruit and all the products that originate from these. This would certainly be kinder to nature as organic production means no use of chemical fertilizers or additives. It would mean no pollution to the environment and no chemical additives in our food. We consume these chemicals every day in our food and they are harmful. But behind all this are the interests of big manufacturers, lobbies, huge profits which are the driving force for these food manufacturers’ conglomerates. Nonetheless I believe that awareness of people continues to increase in our country and in EU. People are more and more searching for natural alternatives; they are turning to nature and becoming more aware of problems regarding animals and animal products.

 

Would you on the basis of your own experiences recommend people to try vegetarianism?

 

If I do it myself I can’t see a reason why I wouldn’t recommend it to others. I have no complaints as I said; I have more energy than I need.  If nothing else I am living proof that you can survive without meat and meat products.

 

How do you view the fact that we all have to pay the same national insurance contributions?

 

It is well known that vegetarians are a lot healthier and therefore don’t use the health service as frequently.
This is a wider problem; the whole concept could be different. I don’t think that is a valid point, because there should be some solidarity, where healthy people help those, who are unwell. It is true however that everyone is responsible for their own health. If we consumed less harmful and unhealthy food, we would considerably lessen the financial burden on our health service. Of course it is not in everybody’s interest if that were to happen.
What would happen to pharmaceutical industries, huge multinational companies which make billions from sick people?

 

What is your view on hunting?

 

Hunting as killing animals in the name of sport is unethical. If you are referring to the part of the hunting organization that looks after nature environment and wild animals, for example helping with feeding in the winter - it is very useful. Hunting which is by definition just chasing and killing of animals is of course completely unethical.

 

What is your opinion on live animal testing?

 

This is a well known dilemma which has recently been in forefront of politics in Europe, in Great Britain. You have to ask yourself would you like it if you were the subject of such testing. During the second world war my father was an inmate in the concentration camp in Dachau, where he was subjected to such medical experiments together with thousands other people. He didn’t like it one bit. Some people would say it is necessary for the progress of science but I am sure that in most cases alternative methods can be used without the need for animal testing.

 

Where do you think the brutal treatment of animals originates?

 

It comes from low level of people’s awareness.

 

And looking historically?

 

It is difficult to pinpoint the exact time in history. It is a question of respecting life in general. Animals are live creatures with feelings. Everyone who has a domestic animal or a pet knows that animals have feelings. The world’s religions often speak about respecting life but they only mean human life and sometimes not even that. Looking back in the Middle Ages Catholics proclaimed for a long time that native Red Indians which were enslaved by the Spanish and Portuguese do not have a soul. This meant that they weren’t treated as living creatures with feelings. Then they changed their mind and proclaimed that black people don’t have souls. Centuries of black slavery followed. All this happened with the blessing of the Church. Today nobody accepts this anymore. We can see how historical conscience of people is changing despite the opposing views from some institutions at different points in time.

 

It’s nearly Christmas. For millions of people it is time for happiness, love and peace. For millions of animals it is a time of terrible cruelty at slaughter so that our tables can be laden with carcases. And all this to celebrate the birth of a man who loved animals, protected them and didn’t kill them. What is your view on this?

 

Jesus would be turning in his grave if he knew that mass slaughter of animals is carried out every year in his name. His deliverance is based on absolute respect of life and it is very difficult to imagine that he would accept millions of living creatures being killed in his honour.

 

Are you aware that all vegetarians (including you) are cursed by the Church and are condemned to eternal hell?

 

Fortunately people who say this don’t decide who goes to hell and who doesn’t.

 

All the world leaders always emphasise their endeavours for world peace. Do you think peace is connected to our relationship to animals and nourishment of people without the need for killing?

 

Tolstoy said “As long as there are slaughter houses there will be wars”
If a person’s conscience is highly developed they will not kill or be cruel to animals. You can not expect from such person to go to war and kill people for a profit. People who do not kill and eat animals have a greater chance of finding a way to live in peace in harmony. Everything is interconnected in one’s conscience. On a higher level one comes with the other. Making people more aware is the key.

 

How do world’s politicians view this?

 

The world’s politicians are no more aware of this than most people. I have noticed that in many cases ordinary people are ahead of politicians. We see a lot of non govermental organizations championing causes that are not priorities of governments. Be it our treatment of animals, environment or climate change. This push for change is coming from ordinary members of society. When the critical mass of people accepts an idea, when majority of people expect and demand change only then will the politics respond. Sadly politicians are not the ones to encourage others to be conscious but instead they follow public opinion of the moment. When they see the public support slipping they reassess their priorities.

 

Tolstoy is just one of many “great minds” of mankind, who publicly spoke for vegetarianism. Let me name a few: Pythagoras, Leonardo da Vinci, Nikola Tesla, Albert Einstein, and Mahatma Ghandi….These people are recognized for their great works and achievements, they are often quoted in recognition of their genius. Why do you think that mankind does not want to hear about animals and vegetarianism from these great people for example this daring saying from Albert Einstein “Nothing will increase our chances of survival on Earth as significantly as will switching to vegetarian food.”

 

How would you comment on this quote from the genius physicist?
 
Certainly the chances of long-term survival of mankind would increase. Everything is connected. Better quality food is somehow connected with higher level of consciousness. It is a parallel process if we can do one we can do the other. However it is unreasonable to expect from people with lower levels of consciousness who are cruel to animals, to end wars, to stop manipulating others, to help eradicate world poverty. In short as long as consciousness level is low all the disagreements in the world today will remain and possibly increase to the point of annihilation of humans.

 

Are the people who say they love animals, but they eat meat, real animal lovers?

 

I think that people do love animals, their pets, but somehow they automatically eat other animals. If they had to slaughter a cow before they could have a steak, they would think twice. Meat products are so altered in appearance that people don’t associate them with real animals.

 

Some ladies wear animal fur in winter. What is your view on this fashion industry?

 

Again it’s the question of consciousness of people. People often automatically accept the behavioural patterns without questioning them. Only when you question something, you can change your point of view and become more aware of what you are buying.
Where do people get the right to slaughter, incarcerate and torture animals and at the same time demand peace and all the rights for themselves? Is this sanctioned in the constitution? 
It is not sanctioned as such, of course the lawyers and legislators will tell you it is not barred; but it is indeed assumed it is legitimate.

 

From unofficial source I’ve heard that even your dog Brodi is vegetarian. Is it true?

 

You’ve been informed well. You’d better ask him personally. I’m not authorised to answer in his name. (laughing)

 

Resource: Magazine Liberation of animals, january 2006,
Edited by The Society for the Rights and the Liberation of Animals Slovenia,
info@osvoboditev-zivali.org , www.osvoboditev-zivali.org
Damjan Likar


Disclaimer: All items published in this magazine were received by us and we pass them on in good faith. We are not responsible for incorrect email addresses, errors, omissions etc. by the originators.

 

INTERNATIONAL MOVEMENT AGAINST BULLFIGHTS

www.iwab.org

 

This Magazine published by Maria Lopes
marialopes@iwab.org

 

  

| Home | Who We Are | Metaphysical Help | Atrium | Holy Rule | Ralph's Page |

Selected Links OS+B
Rotating Banners System

Animals through the World
Supported by the Latino Portal R+C of Ordo Svmmvm Bonvm  4th Anniversary