To stop the geese torture involved in the production of "foie
gras".
Source: Mark Richards
Ministère de l'Agriculture, de l'Alimentation, de la Pêche, et
des Affaires
Rurales
78, rue de Varenne 75349 PARIS 07 SP,
FRANCE.
Emails:
communication@agriculture.gouv.fr, grand-public@agriculture.gouv.fr
Dear French authorities,
There is no festive season for birds used in the production of
"foie gras". Foie gras (French for "fatty liver") is made from the grotesquely
enlarged livers of male ducks and geese. To deliver the huge amount of food
required to produce these swollen livers, most birds are kept permanently in
cages so small that they can't stretch even one wing or stand properly. Their
necks stick out, allowing feeders to grab them and pump up to 2 pounds of food
per day into their stomachs through long metal pipes. This ordeal often bruises
or tears the birds' necks, making it painful for them to drink.
The process of forced feeding is so traumatic and the
confinement and conditions on foie gras farms so debilitating that the
pre-slaughter mortality rate for foie gras production is up to 20 times the
average rate on other cruel duck factory farms. Because these cramped conditions
prevent them from turning around, these sensitive birds are not even allowed to
preen - one of the most basic instinctual driving forces for birds. Not only
are these flock animals prevented from forming social groups, their indoor,
factory-farm conditions also prevent them from spending even one moment of their
short lives basking in the sun or water. When they are slaughtered, these ducks
and geese have livers that are swollen to up to 10 times their normal
size.
The production of foie gras is outlawed in many countries.
Please follow their ethical lead and ban "foie gras" production. It is time to
consign the force-feeding of birds to the history books.
Yours sincerely,
Name/Country
Please also contact your local French embassy.
Many embassies can be found at http://france.embassyhomepage.com/
Dear French embassy,
There is no festive season for birds used in the production of
"foie gras". Foie gras (French for "fatty liver") is made from the grotesquely
enlarged livers of male ducks and geese. To deliver the huge amount of food
required to produce these swollen livers, most birds are kept permanently in
cages so small that they can't stretch even one wing or stand properly. Their
necks stick out, allowing feeders to grab them and pump up to 2 pounds of food
per day into their stomachs through long metal pipes. This ordeal often bruises
or tears the birds' necks, making it painful for them to drink.
The process of forced feeding is so traumatic and the
confinement and conditions on foie gras farms so debilitating that the
pre-slaughter mortality rate for foie gras production is up to 20 times the
average rate on other cruel duck factory farms. Because these cramped conditions
prevent them from turning around, these sensitive birds are not even allowed to
preen - one of the most basic instinctual driving forces for birds. Not only are
these flock animals prevented from forming social groups, their indoor,
factory-farm conditions also prevent them from spending even one moment of their
short lives basking in the sun or water. When they are slaughtered, these ducks
and geese have livers that are swollen to up to 10 times their normal
size.
The production of foie gras is outlawed in many countries.
Please ask the French Government to follow their ethical lead and ban "foie
gras" production. It is time to consign the force-feeding of birds to the
history books.
Yours sincerely,
Name/Country
JAPAN
Cyber campaing to urge Japan to stop whaling
Source: http://www.seashepherd.org and http://www.seashepherd.nl/
Sea Shepherd Europe is launching a cyber campaign to urge
Japan to stop whaling. The whales need your urgent help and need you to write to
the Japanese ambassador in your country and urgently ask him not to double the
intended kill quota in the Antarctic region to 800 Minke Whales, 50 Humpback
and 50 Fin Whales. And we need you to ask the ambassador to stop whaling in the
Antarctic.
To find the Japanese embassy in your country:
http://www.mofa.go.jp/about/emb_cons/over/index.html
Embassy of Japan
101-104 Piccadilly
London W1J
7JT
Telephone (9:30-13:00 & 14:30-17:30 only)
General Enquiries 020
7465 6543/6544
Fax 020 7491 9347
Emails: info@jpembassy.org.uk, ma@fpcj.jpn.or.jp
France:
Embassy of Japan
Avenue Hoche 7
75008
Paris
Phone: 01.48.88.62.00
Fax: 01.42.27.50.81
Email: scijap@pratique.fr
The Netherlands:
Japanse ambassade
Tobias Asserlaan
2
2517 KC DEN HAAG
Fax: 070-3469544
Email: japan.cultural@planet.nl
BELGIUM:
Embassy of Japan
Kunstlaan 58, Avenue des
Arts
1000 Brussel
Phone: 02/511.23.07
Fax: 02/514.53.33
Email:
kobun1@amb-jpn.be
Subject : Doubling of Killing Whales in
Antarctica.
Dear Ambassador,
As we all know, Japan is a beautiful country with a rich
culture and tradition, and nowadays many of that culture find its way to the
west, and attracts many western people. Numerous people practice Japanese budo,
have
an interest in Zen meditation, discover Japanese art, read novels from
Japanese writers, or simple watch Japanese manga on television.
Also Japan is without doubt a highly developed nation
concerning technology and economy, and is for those reasons the leading nation
in the Asian region.
However, from the viewpoint of environmental issues or animal
protection, Japan is not playing a leading role, it is globally on a very low
level, and sadly Japan doesn't make much effort to improve. Japan lacks
international environmental and animal protection laws such as there are in any
western nation. And it grossly disrespect international treaties concerning
endangered animals, such as the trade in ivory (which is openly sold) and
killing of whales for "scientific" reasons, which seems a mere loophole for
commercial whaling.
We want to stop the killing of whales for any reasons, now and
in the future. Those creatures have been hunted for centuries until the brink
of extinction halfway the last century. They have a mere two decades of relative
peace without large scale commercial hunting. For any animal that produces young
so slowly and so little, it needs much more than a few decades to recover from a
slaughter that continued for centuries.
Western nations who used to whale for centuries, such as
U.S.A, Great Britain, and Australia, all stopped.
We often hear "whaling and eating whale meat is part of our
culture". Well, I think most young Japanese people never ate whale meat and are
not interested in it. Many young people don't know what their country is doing
to marine mammals. They have no idea of the whale killing or dolphin
slaughters in Taiji Bay or Futo Bay.
And there is nothing traditional or cultural about hunting
with modern ships and modern equipment. Nowadays modern whaling is just a bloody
commercial activity about earning much money, raping and destroying the oceans,
it is killing animals who have no change at all in a brutal, bloody and very
cowardly way. It is not at all a "tradition" and it is nothing to be proud
of.
The only thing any modern and civilized nation can do, is to
put "whaling" into a museum, and to change from "whaling" into "whale watching",
for people to enjoy, and get more respect for the natural world and the planet
we live on.
Your country has announced that it intends to double the kill
quota of Minke Whales and that you will target for the first time in decades -
the endangered Humpback and Fin Whales.
Your country will be in violation of the 1986 moratorium on
commercial whaling set by the International Whaling Commission (IWC) and you
will be whaling illegally in the Southern Oceans Whale Sanctuary. In addition,
Japan will be targeting endangered species.
We urgently ask you not to double your intended kill quota in
the Antarctic region to 800 Minke Whales, 50 Humpback and 50 Fin Whales. We ask
you to stop whaling in the Antarctic.
We are very happy, and fully supporting the view of the
Australian Prime Minister John Howard with his standpoint against
whaling.
We also urgently ask you to stop the mass slaughter of the
dolphins near Taiji, Futo and other places.
In this aspect we fully support the American "Senate
Resolution 99" that strongly condemns the Japanese dolphin
slaughter.
Regards
Name/Country/Email
PAKISTAN
500,000 dogs in Karachi, Pakistan about to be
poisoned
Source: Engineers and Scientists for Animal Rights (ESAR)
http://www.esar-online.com/
In the city of Karachi (Pakistan) where I had spent a good
part of my life, some terrible things are about to happen.
It is hard to believe that just a few years back when I
visited Karachi, I was able to raise Animal Rights awareness among the citizens
of Karachi to the point that one of Pakistan's prestigious journal SOUTHASIA
published two issue on the subject, one of which was an exclusive on Animal
Rights. The SOUTHASIA magazine then received a commendation award from the Ark
Trust during its Genesis Award ceremony at Beverly
Hills,California.
These awards are given to media for their works in promoting
the cause for Animal Rights. During my visit Pakistan Art Council, Pakistan
Medical Association,and my own group Engineers and Scientists for Animal Rights
also sponsored an art exhibit where young children presented powerful graphics
addressing the issue of Animal Rights. This tells me the Karachi's citizens are
sensitive compassionate people.
But today the Mayor of Karachi is about to go on a rampage of
poisoning Karachi's 500,000 stray dogs by showing total disregard to the
alternatives that are being presented by Pakistan Animal Welfare Society(PAWS)
along with a large number of doctors, health officials and Karachi citizens. As
I leaned that the City of Karachi under the direction of its mayor is preparing
500,000 capsules of strychnine to kill than many dogs.
I have been in
constant touch with Mahera Omar of PAWS who is asking for help in terms of
e-mails and letters from the international community (organizations as well as
individuals) be sent to the authorities and ask them to refrain from this
barbaric practices of medieval ages and look at the alternatives that could be
humane and more effective in reducing stray dog population in
Karachi.
Please send your e-mail to the President of Pakistan General
Parvez Musharraf who is a dog lover himself.
http://www.presidentofpakistan.gov.pk/WTPresidentMessage.aspx
The following web-site has more details and also has the
contact numbers for the Pakistani officials and the Pakistani embassies around
the world
http://www.pawspakistan.org/forums/viewtopic.php?id=6
president_pml@msn.com;tourism@isb.comsats.net.pk;
Parepcanberra@internode.on.net;parepottawa@rogers.com; pareptoronto@sprint.ca;parepmontreal@sprint.ca;contact@finbyte.com; parepcopenhagen@hotmail.com;info@pak-embassy.gr;
info@pakistanembassy.se; pareplondon@supanet.com,
citynazim@karachicity.gov.pk,
edohealth@karachicity.gov.pk,governor@governorsindh.gov.pk,
Dear Mr. President
I was appalled to learn that the mayor of Karachi Mr.
Niamatullah Khan has decided to poison Karachi’s 100,000 dogs in an effort to
solve the city’s stray dogs problem. Please note that such measures are barbaric
and ineffective. There are humane and more effective solutions available and
were being presented to him by the concerned citizens of Karachi, and by the
Pakistan Animal Welfare Society.
Name/Country
Send letters to the editors of leading newspapers in
Pakistan
letters@dawn.com;news.post@thenews.com.pk;letters@dailytimes.com.pk; observer@isb.comsats.net.pk
I have been informed by the Pakistan Animal Welfare Society
that “thousands of stray dogs who have long roamed the streets of Karachi,
Pakistan, may soon be the target of an extensive and cruel campaign to eliminate
them.” It is said that the authorities will spread capsules of strychnine in the
streets.
I must protest against this kind of cruel action. Strychnine
is a very violent poison which causes a slow death. Populations of stray dogs
and the rabies must be controlled, but certainly not by a
slaughter.
I urge the authorities concerned to reconsider their plan and
discuss it with the Pakistan animal welfare associations in order to find ways
to resolve the problem of rabies without cruelty.
Yours sincerely,
Name/Country
SOUTH AFRICA
CALL TO BAN GUNS AT SEA - GUN FREE FISHING
Source:Seal Alert-SA
Helen Bamford, a reporter for the Weekend Argus Newspaper
wrote the following article on the 23rd July 2005 - "Plea to ban guns being
taken on sea fishing trips". Mike Meyer an official tasked with protecting Cape
Fur Seals from the department of Marine and Coastal Management had the following
comment
"They were powerless to prevent skippers taking weapons to sea
because it was their constitutional right"
The shooting of Cape Fur Seals at sea, has a long and sad
history. Beginning with the first European explorer to our shores in 1497. Vasco
Da Gama the famous Portuguese explorer was reported to have fired his ship's
cannon on seal colony off Mossel Bay for no apparent reason. So began the era of
seal abuse in South Africa. As more and more seafarers arrived at the Cape, more
and more seal colonies were attacked, evolving slowly into the commercial
harvest of seal pups for their skins and large bulls for their genitalia. By the
start of the 1900's, millions and millions of seals had been slaughtered, all
the offshore island seal colonies over 3000 km of coastline had slowly been
exterminated, this species of seal had become virtually extinct.
In 1897 the seals received their first legal protection, but
as we see, the leaders of our country are as much a part of the problem as the
seal killing skipper fisherman. On the 25th March 1911, Noel Janisch, Provincial
Secretary of the Cape wrote, "A party of about 30 members of Parliament have
arranged to go on a steamer to Saldanha ....... they are anxious to have a
little sport amongst the porpoises and seals along the way. Application is
therefore made for a special permit to shoot some of these animals during the
trip."
In 1973, the Cape Fur Seals became protected under the Sea
Birds and Seals Protection Act no.46 and it became a criminal offence to "pursue
or shoot at or wilfully disturb, kill or capture a seal. After years of
campaigning for an updated Seal Protection Act, the Department of Environmental
Affairs in March 2004, gazetted and released it's new draft policy on the Seals
and Seabirds Protection Act. It now states, Killing of Seals (3.1.1.10) - Policy
will general prohibit the killing of seals, and Incidental capture by fisheries
(3.1.1.3) - Restrictions will be implemented on the use or carrying of
fire-arms, ammunition or explosives abroad fishing vessels, with a view to the
control of the illegal shooting of seals at sea.
On behalf of Seal Alert-SA in 2001, advocate Gary Pienaar of
the Public Protectors Office raised the question with MCM's Dr Jeremy David (He
has since retired). The official rely from Dr David's was as follows "Guns are
required by fishing companies and skippers to be taken to sea, in order to keep
unruly crew in order and because of sea-pirates".
In 2002, Debra Patta of 3rd Degree E-TV in the program titled
"Who is butchering our Seals", put the question to Deputy Director of MCM, Horst
Kleinschmidt, who stated "That MCM is aware of this problem, is totally opposed
to fisherman shooting seals".
In a debate letter to the Cape Times by Horst Kleinschmidt in
2003, he wrote "Some fishers shoot seals, injurying or killing them. We are
equally opposed to such conduct. They do this believing that seals consume
catches they feel are theirs. Their behaviour is uninformed and demands
unequivocal condemnation. We prosecute if wild animals on land are shot at or
trapped. The same holds true for seals. If anyone shoots at seals, we will
prosecute. We do not condone conduct of this kind and ask people to come forward
with evidence of this".
In the Weekend Argus in 2004, "Trigger-happy fisherman target
seals". The article states "Fisherman who shot seals almost always used shotguns
- and often out of sight of other boats and witnesses on land - so even where a
suspect could be identified and the pellets recovered, it was impossible to link
the killing ballastically to a specific weapon." The carcasses sometimes washed
up long after the seals have been shot. "Ninety-nine percent of the time it is a
shotgun they use," Marine and Coastal Management Port Elizabeth station manager
Eugene Swart said. "it is not accidental, they are shooting at these seals
deliberately but it is not easy to track down the culprits".
There are approximately 2900 licenced South African Fishing
boats, of which 2500 are Handline boats. It is these skippers in this handline
fishing industry that are the most notorious, for shooting seals illegally,
although almost all fishing skippers throughout the industry are known to be
involved in this unacceptable criminal activity, skippers from big trawler
fleets, deep sea trawlers, in-shore and mid-water trawlers, long line boats,
ski-boats and sportsfisherman.
Although the seals have been protected for over 34-years, and
hundreds if not thousands of seals have been illegally shot year after year, not
one single fisherman has ever been arrested or convicted for shooting a seal. A
simple assessment of the potential gravity of this situation in South African
waters, can be obtained by reviewing the seal population surveys for the same
period, on assessment it found that over the past 30-odd years, over One Million
Seals have disappeared without sound scientific explanation, with 42 000 seal
pups being born in 1971 on the offshore islands in South Africa, and after
26-years, the seal population has not only shown no growth, but has actually
decline to 40 000 seal pups being born in 1997.
The statement in the press by the official tasked with
protecting seals is clearly wrong, for in the Constitution of South Africa, no
mention is made of guns. However under the Bill of Rights it clearly states,
Environment, everyone has the right a) to an environment that is not harmful to
their health or well-being; and b) to have the environment protected, for the
benefit of present and future generations, through reasonable legislative and
other measures that ii) promote conservation.
I therefore ask that the following Sample Letter being copied
(or a letter of your choice) and to send it to the following email
addresses.
Minister of the Department of Environmental Affairs and
Tourism :
Martinus Van Schalkwyk (personal assistant Marika Willemse
mwillemse@deat.gov.za
Public Protector - Advocate Gary Pienaar
garyp@pprotect.org
Editor of ETV NEWS
Andy.Duffy@etv.co.za
Reporter of the Weekend Argus
Helenb@incape.co.za
Letters Editor of the Weekend Argus
wealet@ctn.independent.co.za
Legal Official at MCM - Marius Diemont
mdiemont@iafrica.com
**********************************
mwillemse@deat.gov.za,garyp@pprotect.org,Andy.Duffy@etv.co.za,
Helenb@incape.co.za,wealet@ctn.independent.co.za,
mdiemont@iafrica.com
Dear Minister Martinus Van Schalkwyk/Department of
Environmental Affairs and Tourism,
CALL FOR A BAN ON GUNS BEING TAKEN TO SEA DURING FISHING
TRIPS - THE ILLEGAL SHOOTING OF SEALS
It has come to my attention, that although the Cape Fur Seals
in South Africa are a protected species, that fisherman licenced by your
department of Marine and Coastal Management (MCM), have been engaged in
illegally shooting seals for the past 34-years.
I completely concur with the media statement of your former
Deputy Director of Marine and Coastal Management, Mr Kleinschmidt in 2004, when
he stated
"Some fishers shoot seals, injurying or killing them. We are
equally opposed to such conduct. They do this believing that seals consume
catches they feel are theirs. Their behaviour is uninformed and demands
unequivocal condemnation. We prosecute if wild animals on land are shot at or
trapped. The same holds true for seals. If anyone shoots at seals, we will
prosecute. We do not condone conduct of this kind and ask people to come forward
with evidence of this".
I also understand that in the new Seal Protection Draft
policy, that this is being further addressed and your department is to be
congratulated on bringing in the section, Incidental capture by fisheries
(3.1.1.3) - Restrictions will be implemented on the use or carrying of
fire-arms, ammunition or explosives abroad fishing vessels, with a view to the
control of the illegal shooting of seals at sea.
However, as per this latest incident reported in the Weekend
Argus, and the numerous other media articles published, it is clear that the
laws or restrictions proposed are ineffective in addressing these criminal
activities, confirmed further by the non-arrest or conviction of any seal
killing fisherman in over 34-years.
I therefore ask that with immediate effect a ban is placed on
taking guns to sea during fishing trips.
South Africa should pride itself on being a civilized country,
it is already known for it's high crime rate, and clearly guns have no place
being at sea during licenced fishing trips.
Yours Sincerely
Name/Country
PETITIONS
To recognise animals as sentients beings in South
Africa
http://www.sentience.co.za/
Support PAWS: Pet Animal Welfare Statute
https://community.hsus.org/campaign/2005_PAWS2
Save Hedgehogs from Annual Cull
http://www.thePetitionSite.com/takeaction/390802029
"Bring me home..." Repatriation of orangutans from Bangkok
Safari World
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/822035733?ltl=1121612391
Take Action to Save the Amur Leopard!
http://www.democracyinaction.org/pacificenvironment/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=943
DOES THEIR BLOOD WORTH YOUR MONEY?
http://www.petitiononline.com/HKDKP012/
To end suffer of Animals in Belgrade Zoo:
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/777611166
Help STOP "Cruelty 101"
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/440822961?ltl=1122499500
Stop the Omak Suicide Race. Save
the horses!
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/906165664?ltl=1122558035