A monthly Magazine edited and
published
by
Maria
Lopes
- March
2007
Dear Friends,
The Written Declaration 0002/2007 (calling for a ban on bullfighting and
bull breeders subsidies) had been signed by 176 MEPs on the 15th of
March, according to European Union official numbers. Probably the real
number is higher because the EU does not update their website regularly.
It hasn't been updated since that date. The lapse date is 15th April and
we are far away from the 393 signatures needed.
It's not brilliant but hope is the last thing to die so please continue to
send emails to convince the MEPs of the importance of signing this
document to end the subsidies to bull breeders. Please send emails to
Italy, Sweden, Danemark, Germany, Hungary, Romania, etc, because the
majority of British MEPs have already signed. All details can be found at
our website at http://www.iwab.org/campaign.html
For the Animals
Maria Lopes
Coordinator
DENMARK
UPDATE - PROTEST AGAINST RODEOS AT
COPENHAGEN
Good News! The Hilton Hotel Copenhagen has
removed its sponsorship for this rodeo event. So there is no further need to
write to them, but please continue to send protest emails to the ohter
sponsors.
INDIA
India's Chinese-style dog
culls! Source: It's Their Destiny http://itstheirdestiny.2kat.net With
successful Animal Birth Control programs operated throughout most of India, few
would have thought that this country would have such a problem with stray dogs
that they would feel a need to resort to extreme measures. Although generally
this is true in the rest of India, the State of Karnataka has never really
embraced the concept of spay and release. The population growth of these dogs is
encouraged by the countless unauthorised and illegal meat shops in its cities,
which not only kill their animals without any enforced regulations, but dispose
of their waste and surplus meat by throwing it into the streets.
When a couple of children were killed by packs of homeless dogs
recently, the authorities acted quickly to cover their incompetence by putting
the blame squarely on the street dogs. The fact that the kids were killed in the
close proximity of some of these illegal meat shops was ignored. Originating in
Bangalore, culls of strays are now underway in the cities of Mysore and Mandya
and are spreading throughout the state. Contrary to some reports, the culls have
not been declared illegal - this is happening NOW and the victims are expected
to number many thousands. Unlike their Chinese counterparts, the
Indian dog killers are not targeting pet dogs, but any homeless dogs they find
on the street are being killed using methods very reminiscent of China. No
humane euthanasia here. Strangled, gassed, beaten to death, injected with
cyanide or electrocuted, the dogs of Karnataka fare no better than in some of
the worst areas of China. You can read more on these culls at the
following links; http://catsofbangalore.blogspot.com (images,
videos and eye-witness accounts) Newspaper reports http://www.hindu.com/2007/03/05/stories/2007030514070100.htm http://uk.news.yahoo.com/04032007/323/bangalore-targets-street-dogs-child-mauled-death.html http://www.tehelka.com/story_main28.asp?filename=Cr240307Bangalore_vs.asp TV report (video)
Dear Sir, I was horrified to
learn that, unlike other States of India, Karnataka is dealing with the problem
of street dogs with a campaign of mass-killings. Throughout India
homeless dogs are commonplace, yet in many States their numbers are being
controlled effectively by Animal Birth Control programs. No animal population
can grow more than available food permits and when dogs are neutered, vaccinated
and returned to their own territory, they prevent other dogs moving in, thus
limiting their numbers naturally. When, as in Karnataka however,
ample supplies of food are thrown into the streets by illegal meat sellers,
their numbers will obviously increase. By simply killing the dogs you are
encouraging the breeding of replacements. Nature abhors a vacuum and you are
creating a situation in which the culls will have to be repeated
indefinitely. I urge you instead to catch, neuter and vaccinate the
strays of Karnataka, release them back onto the streets, and close down the
illegal and unhygienic meat traders that are the real cause of this
problem. India has a reputation throughout the world as a humane
country, and its people are renown for their kindness. I beg you not to let this
reputation be so tarnished by cruel, inefficient, and easily avoidable methods
of animal control. Yours sincerely Name/Country
SOUTH AFRICA
Urge South Africa to 'Cull' Elephant Killing
>From Policy
Source: Linda Furness
South Africa’s newest elephant “management” policy includes
killing as an option for controlling elephant populations.
These mass killing operations tear apart elephant families
and leave the survivors permanently scarred. Between 1967 and 1995, 14,562
elephants in South Africa’s Kruger National Park were culled. Terrified
elephants were herded into groups with helicopters while people on the ground
and in the air opened fire with high-powered weapons. Elephants are capable of
communicating over long distances, and their death screams were undoubtedly
heard by other elephants miles away. Innumerable orphaned calves, who were
regarded as valuable collateral, were sold to zoos and circuses, where many were
beaten into submission, chained, and confined and had their precious freedom
taken and their spirits broken. And scientists are now determining that these
individuals were left with lifelong emotional trauma from witnessing the violent
executions of their families.
Although elephants are considered by many to be the
quintessential symbol of the African continent and ecotourism plays an important
role in the South African economy, many of the country’s officials treat
elephants as nuisances to be “controlled,” marketed, and profited from. These
magnificent animals are viewed by some as commodities to be killed, hacked into
pieces, skinned, canned, carved, and sold bit by bit.
Numerous scientists have condemned South Africa’s proposal to
kill elephants. There is no evidence that elephants pose an imminent risk to
biodiversity. Reducing the elephant population is arbitrary and scientifically
unsound, and it reflects outdated wildlife-management principles. Please urge
South Africa to remove culling from the list of options for elephant
“management” and implement the humane, sensible suggestions advocated by
scientists and reported by Care for the Wild International, including the
following:
• Reduce the number of artificially created watering
holes—this would divert elephants to previously underutilized areas. • Expand
protected elephant habitats by linking them to adjacent areas, and develop
migration corridors to other regions. • Develop community-based
wildlife-conservation programs outside the existing protected areas to increase
the benefits of tourism to nearby rural areas. • Protect vulnerable and
valuable areas by erecting and maintaining fences and implementing other
nonlethal deterrents. • Administer contraception, which is affordable and
involves minimal intervention that can reduce the number of elephants in a large
population.
Please send polite comments to:
Even though elephant culling has generated a worldwide
outcry, the zoo community has remained strangely silent. If zoos truly foster
respect for wildlife, as they purport to do, they should be leading the charge
to prevent this tragedy. Please contact your local zoo officials and ask them to
do the following:
• Speak out publicly against any elephant “management”
proposal that includes culling as an option. • Pledge not to obtain elephant
calves orphaned in culls, thus removing African countries’ financial incentive
to slaughter adult elephants.
UNITED KINGDOM
European Commission turns its back on the
seals / 3 simple ways you can help the seals
Source: seals seals With the
Canadian Seal 'Hunt' due to start in a matter of days, the European Commission
has said 'no' to banning the import of seal products into the European
Union. Despite unprecedented support from 425 MEPs, the European
Commission has ruled that it will not implement a ban, but will instead
commission a study into the 'hunt' to gauge whether it is humane or not (even
though numerous other studies and extensive video footage prove the inherent
cruelty involved). This study could take years to complete - in the
meantime, many hundreds of thousands of Harp seal pups will be slaughtered on
the ice floes of Canada's east coast. Dr Caroline Lucas MEP,
together with other co-sponsor MEPS of the European Parliament, have been
pressing the Commission to implement a ban. Other countries in Europe and
beyond, have already put bans in place, or are expected to do so within the very
near future. The UK government (through the UK minister for trade)
has stated that it is: 'deeply concerned about the reported cruelty of the
Canadian seal hunt and that the UK will press the European Commission to put
forward an EU-wide ban on harp and hooded deal products.' Now that no such
ban is imminent, the UK government needs to be lobbied to implement its own
ban. With the UK being the second largest importer of Canadian seal
skins (Denmark being the largest), any ban would send a very strong message to
the Canadian government. What can you do? Sign a
petition urging the Prime Minister to implement a ban: http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/SAVESEALS/
Urge him to implement a ban.
_________________________________________________________________
Tail Docking
Source: South Devon Greyhound Action
The new Animal Welfare Law comes into force next month but
some tail docking is still permitted after MPs were lobbied during its final
stages, no doubt by those who have managed to find loopholes in the anti hunting
act. No 10 has a petition you can sign against docking IF YOU ARE A UK
CITIZEN LIVING IN THE UK OR ABROAD OR IF YOU ARE A FOREIGN NATIONAL RESIDENT IN
THE UK The link to the petition is http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/antitaildock/
The closing date to sign is in May and when I signed earlier
today there were only 54 signatures. Please sign and spread the word to anybody
you know who is elligible.
U.S.A.
Ironweed Films Promotes Rodeo
Propaganda
Source: SHARK Recently a SHARK supporter and
Ironweed member brought to our attention the surprising news that Ironweed Films
is promoting the movie Rank as the highlight of its March selection.
Surprising because Ironweed promotes itself as a progressive,
socially-conscious film club, and the documentary Rank is just that, but not in
the way the filmmakers meant. Rank is a glorification of the thugs that
choose to make a living by attempting to dominate, often through abuse, the
bulls they ride as unwilling participants in their cowboy charade.
However, Ironweed is promoting this film on its website and
to its members describing it thus, "Through breathtaking cinematography, gritty
action and starkly honest storytelling, "Rank" paints the portrait of three
Professional Bull Riding champions and the beautiful bulls they ride...The dance
between human and beast, the balance with the natural world and the theme of the
American Western are fleshed out against the backdrop of the high intensity PBR
World Finals."
Any caring, thinking person would realize that these
tormented creatures, who are trucked around the country, shocked, spiked, and
beaten, are not doing anything like "dancing."
Please contact Ironweed, especially if you are a member, and
let them know just how abusive and reprehensible the rodeo industry truly is.
Their description and promotion of this film is not a 'critical look' at the
realities of bull riding; it is a propaganda piece choreographed by those that
make their living from the abuse of animals.
phone: 866-456-9333 (Monday through Friday, 9-6 PM PST)
write:
Ironweed Films 660 York St., #102 San Francisco, CA
94110
Below is a letter sent by a caring and insightful Ironweed
member. The sender reports that her letter caught the attention of
Ironweed's decision makers and the film club, while regrettably not willing to
pull Rank from the March selection or change their glowing description of the
film, responded that they are having "renewed discussion of the film and
Ironweed's social goals and responsibilities."
Ironweed needs to hear from more people on this issue! Please
read the letter below and then contact Ironweed with your own comments.
Please write a different letter.
Dear Ironweed,
I've been a member for about a year now, and for the most
part I really do enjoy the movies you provide members. However, looking ahead to
March, I'm rather disturbed. I thought that perhaps your July 2006 issue was an
anomaly, with its inclusion of The Wildest Show in the South: The Angola Prison
Rodeo. Since you market yourselves as a progressive organization dedicated to
promoting socially-conscious cinema, I thought surely you included that short
film because of its focus on the criminal justice system and used some sort of
cost-benefit analysis to deem the portrayal of the exploitation of animals in
such a fashion. However, seeing that you've chosen Rank as your March 2007
feature, I'm no longer sure of that. Indeed, I must say that I am appalled by
your choice, and though I appreciate Ironweed I am seriously reconsidering my
membership.
I understand that it is a common misconception that rodeos
cause little harm to animals or that they are purely fun or a challenging sport.
I encourage you to visit Shark online to disabuse yourselves of that notion;
perhaps by educating yourselves about this issue you will refrain, in the
future, from indirectly promoting such an abusive and cruel "sport" as
"progressive" or "socially conscious" cinema. In the mean time, if I decide to
cancel my subscription, how would I go about doing that?
Best, A.H.
_____________________________________________________
Panasonic now sponsoring cruel
Iditarod
Panasonic has just become an Iditarod race
sponsor. Please help the Iditarod dogs by sending Panasonic protest emails. A
sample letter and email addresses are below.
The Iditarod dogs are helpless victims of
profoundly inhumane treatment and cannot speak for themselves. What happens to
them during the Iditarod includes death, paralysis, penile frostbite, bleeding
ulcers, bloody diarrhea, lung damage, ruptured discs, viral diseases and
pneumonia.
For the dogs, the Iditarod is a bottomless pit
of suffering. Throughout this eight to 16-day competition, Iditarod personnel
encourage mushers to race diseased dogs. Instead of pulling sick dogs from the
race, veterinarians frequently give them massive doses of antibiotics to keep
them running.
Veterinarians also work to help the mushers
before the Iditarod begins. Although the dogs are often sick, veterinarians
allow them to start the race anyway. One chief Iditarod veterinarian even
published a musher/veterinary handbook advising mushers on how to avoid having
prohibited substances detected in pre-race veterinary checks.
SAMPLE LETTER TO PANASONIC:
Dear Mr. Greenberg:
I protest your organization's support of the
Iditarod dog sled race. For the dogs, this barbaric event is a bottomless pit of
suffering. What happens to them during the Iditarod includes death, paralysis,
penile frostbite, bleeding ulcers, bloody diarrhea, lung damage, ruptured discs,
viral diseases and pneumonia. Please end your involvement in this cruel
race.
In the Iditarod, dogs are forced to run 1,150
miles, which is the approximate distance between Miami, Florida and New York
City. USA Today sports columnist Jon Saraceno called the Iditarod "a travesty of
grueling proportions" and "Ihurtadog." Fox sportscaster Jim Rome called it
"I-killed-a-dog." Orlando Sentinel sports columnist George Diaz said the race is
"a barbaric ritual" and "an illegal sweatshop for dogs."
Throughout this eight to 16-day competition,
Iditarod personnel encourage mushers to race diseased dogs. Instead of pulling
sick dogs from the race, veterinarians frequently give them massive doses of
antibiotics to keep them running.
Veterinarians also work to help the mushers
before the Iditarod begins. Although the dogs are often sick, veterinarians
allow them to start the race anyway. One chief Iditarod veterinarian even
published a musher/veterinary handbook advising mushers on how to avoid having
prohibited substances detected in pre-race veterinary checks.
At least 130 dogs have died in the Iditarod. No
one knows how many dogs die after this tortuous ordeal or during
training.
On average, 52 percent of the dogs who start the
race do not make it across the finish line. According to a report published in
the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, of those who do
finish, 81 percent have lung damage. A report published in the Journal of
Veterinary Internal Medicine said that 61 percent of the dogs who finish the
Iditarod have ulcers versus zero percent pre-race.
Tom Classen, retired Air Force colonel and
Alaskan resident for over 40 years, tells us that the dogs are beaten into
submission:
"They've had the hell beaten out of them." "You
don't just whisper into their ears, 'OK, stand there until I tell you to run
like the devil.' They understand one thing: a beating. These dogs are beaten
into submission the same way elephants are trained for a circus. The mushers
will deny it. And you know what? They are all lying." -USA Today, March3, 2000
in Jon Saraceno's column.
Mushers believe in "culling" or killing unwanted
dogs, including puppies. Many dogs who are permanently disabled in the Iditarod,
or who are unwanted for any reason, including those who have outlived their
usefulness, are killed with a shot to the head, dragged or clubbed to death.
"Dogs are clubbed with baseball bats and if they don't pull are dragged to death
in harnesses....." wrote Alaskan Mike Cranford in an article for Alaska's Bush
Blade Newspaper (March, 2000).
Jon Saraceno wrote in his March 3, 2000 column
in USA Today, "He [Colonel Tom Classen] confirmed dog beatings and far worse.
Like starving dogs to maintain their most advantageous racing weight. Skinning
them to make mittens. Or dragging them to their death."
Please end your organization's association with
this horrific race.
Sincerely, Name/Country
PETITIONS
Disclaimer:
All items published in
this magazine were
received by us and we pass
them on in good faith. We
are not responsible for
incorrect email addresses,
errors,
omissions etc. by the
originators.
INTERNATIONAL MOVEMENT AGAINST
BULLFIGHTS
www.iwab.org
This Magazine published by
Maria
Lopes
marialopes@iwab.org
|